Sebring International Raceway - International Corner Analysis - Ferrari 296 GT3 (iRacing)
February 9th, 2024
The speed chart analysis reveals that driverB is entering the corner at a lower speed than driverA, suggesting a carry-over deficit from the previous corner's exit. DriverB also experiences a significant mid-corner speed dip and reaches minimum speed later than driverA, indicating time loss. To improve, driverB should brake harder to reduce braking distance and accelerate earlier to enhance exit speed. In contrast, the throttle control chart shows that driverA is more hesitant with throttle application compared to the decisive and consistent approach of driverB. This hesitancy results in a delayed and less steep acceleration curve for driverA, leading to lost time during corner exit. To address this, driverA needs to apply the throttle earlier and with greater intensity to increase exit speed and reduce lap times. The data suggests that both drivers have specific areas of focus: driverB needs to work on their entry and mid-corner phases, while driverA should concentrate on improving their throttle application for better corner exits.
Analyzing the speed chart, it's evident that driverB is entering the corner with a lower speed compared to driverA. This is indicated by the initial left part of the chart where driverB's speed is already trailing before reaching the braking zone. This suggests that driverB could be carrying over a deficit from the exit of the previous corner, impacting their entry speed into this one. During the mid-corner phase, there's a noticeable dip in driverB's speed compared to driverA, indicating a significant time loss in this section. DriverB reaches their minimum speed later than driverA and also has a less steep acceleration curve post-apex. This suggests that driverB is getting on the throttle later than driverA, which delays their acceleration out of the corner and leads to lower exit speeds. To improve, driverB should focus on braking harder to shorten their braking distance and aim to get on the throttle earlier to maximize their exit speed.
Analyzing the throttle control chart, it's evident that driverA is significantly more hesitant in throttle application compared to driverB. DriverB applies the throttle in a much more decisive and consistent manner, as indicated by the steeper and smoother curve on the graph. This suggests that driverB is accelerating harder and earlier out of the corner, which aligns with the advice to come on throttle earlier to gain time on exit. Furthermore, driverA's gradual and less steep curve indicates a delayed throttle application. This delay is most likely contributing to lost time, especially in comparison to driverB's approach. By applying the throttle earlier and with more conviction, driverA can improve their exit speed, thus reducing overall lap times. The data clearly shows that driverA needs to focus on increasing throttle intensity sooner during corner exit to match the performance of driverB.
