Donington Park Corner Analysis - Lamborghini Huracan GT3 EVO2 (ACC)

February 9th, 2024

Donington Park Corner Analysis - Lamborghini Huracan GT3 EVO2 (ACC)

The speed chart analysis reveals that driverB enters the corner with less speed than driverA, indicating a slower exit from the previous corner and affecting their pace in the current section. DriverB's minimum speed occurs later and is lower than driverA's, suggesting an over-application of throttle and a delay in acceleration. This early throttle application by driverB results in a loss of speed through the corner and a less steep increase in speed post-corner, highlighting an area for improvement. In terms of throttle control, driverA applies the throttle earlier but more aggressively than driverB, leading to potential instability and slower exit speeds. DriverB's smoother and later throttle application allows for better traction and faster corner exits. To enhance performance, driverA should delay and moderate their throttle input to achieve a smoother curve similar to that of driverB. This would help maintain stability, prevent wheelspin, and improve acceleration out of corners.

Analyzing the speed chart, it's evident that driverB is entering the corner with a lower speed compared to driverA. This is indicated by the initial left portion of the chart where driverB's line starts below that of driverA. This suggests that driverB carried less speed out of the previous corner, which has a cascading effect on their overall pace through the current section. As we progress through the corner, there's a noticeable difference in minimum speed where driverB's minimum occurs later and is lower than that of driverA. This indicates not only a delay in acceleration but also a potential over-application of throttle by driverB, as evidenced by their earlier throttle application mentioned in our analysis. The impact here is significant; because driverB gets on the throttle too early, they are unable to carry as much speed through and out of the corner, leading to lost time on exit where they need it most. The gradient of their speed increase post-corner is less steep compared to driverA, confirming this loss in momentum and highlighting an area for improvement.

Speed

In the provided throttle control analysis, there is a clear distinction between the throttle application of driverA and driverB. DriverA initiates throttle application significantly earlier than driverB, as indicated by the steeper curve on the chart. This premature acceleration leads to a less optimal exit speed from the corner, which is evident from the fact that driverB's smoother and later throttle application results in a higher exit speed. Furthermore, driverA's early throttle input is not only premature but also more aggressive, as shown by the rapid increase in throttle percentage. This can cause instability and potential wheelspin, hindering acceleration out of the corner. In contrast, driverB's gradual and controlled increase in throttle allows for better traction and ultimately a faster corner exit. To improve performance, driverA should focus on delaying and moderating their throttle input to mirror the smoother curve exhibited by driverB.

Throttle