Hungaroring Corner Analysis - McLaren 720S GT3 Evo 2023 (ACC)
February 9th, 2024
The speed chart analysis reveals that driverB enters the corner with less speed than driverA, indicating a weaker exit from the previous corner. DriverB also has a lower minimum speed in the middle of the corner and delays throttle application, resulting in a slower exit speed. To improve, driverB should aim to maintain higher minimum speeds and time their throttle application to achieve a faster exit velocity without coming on throttle too early. DriverA, on the other hand, applies throttle prematurely and sharply, as indicated by the steep slope in their graph. This aggressive acceleration likely causes traction issues and potential wheelspin since the vehicle isn't at the optimal point for full power application. In contrast, driverB's gradual throttle application suggests better vehicle balance and traction control, leading to a smoother corner exit. To enhance performance, driverA should focus on modulating throttle input more progressively to emulate driverB's smoother curve. This will help improve corner exit speed and reduce overall lap times by ensuring better traction and vehicle control at this critical phase of cornering.
Analyzing the speed chart, it's evident that driverB is entering the corner with a lower speed compared to driverA. This can be seen at the very start of the chart where driverB's speed line begins below that of driverA. This suggests that driverB did not carry as much speed out of the previous corner, which sets them up at a disadvantage right from the beginning. In the middle of the corner, there is a significant difference in minimum speeds between the two drivers. DriverB's minimum speed is lower and occurs later than that of driverA, indicating a delay in getting back on the throttle. This delay leads to a slower exit speed for driverB and a less steep acceleration gradient compared to driverA. To improve, driverB should focus on maintaining higher minimum speeds and timing their throttle application better to match or exceed driverA's exit velocity, ensuring they do not come on throttle too early which could compromise their exit speed.
In the provided throttle control analysis, driverA exhibits a premature and sharp increase in throttle application compared to driverB. This is evident from the steep slope in driverA's graph, which indicates a sudden and aggressive acceleration. This early application of throttle likely leads to suboptimal traction and potential wheelspin, as the vehicle has not yet reached the ideal point of corner exit where full power can be effectively put down. Furthermore, there is a distinct difference in the timing of throttle application between the two drivers. DriverB applies throttle in a more gradual manner, as shown by the gentler slope on their graph. This suggests better control over vehicle balance and traction, allowing for a smoother exit out of the corner. DriverA should aim to replicate this smoother curve to improve corner exit speed and overall lap time, particularly focusing on modulating throttle input more progressively to match driverB's technique.
