Kyalami Corner Analysis - Honda NSX GT3 Evo 2019 (ACC)

February 9th, 2024

The speed chart analysis reveals that driverB (You) is slower than driverA (Reference) at the corner exit, which is crucial for lap time improvement. DriverB enters the corner with a lower speed and reaches the minimum speed later than driverA, indicating a delayed throttle application. This results in a slower acceleration phase and a lower exit speed. To improve, driverB should focus on an earlier throttle application and possibly use a lower gear to enhance acceleration out of the turn. In terms of throttle control, driverA shows a more cautious approach with delayed and gradual throttle application, leading to lost potential acceleration, especially at the corner exit. In contrast, driverB applies throttle earlier and more decisively, achieving higher speeds upon exiting the corner. This aggressive approach is beneficial for maintaining momentum and improving lap times. Therefore, driverA should aim to apply throttle earlier after the apex to reduce time lost during this critical phase of cornering.

Analyzing the speed chart, it's evident that driverB (You) is losing significant speed at the corner exit compared to driverA (Reference). At the very start of the chart, driverB already has a lower speed entering the corner, indicating a less optimal exit from the previous turn. This initial speed deficit carries through to the corner in question. The minimum speed for driverB occurs later than that of driverA, suggesting a delayed throttle application. This delay is confirmed by a shallower gradient in the speed increase after the corner's apex, pointing to a slower acceleration phase for driverB. The most critical area for improvement for driverB lies in the corner exit phase. The data shows that not only does driverB reach their minimum speed later than driverA, but they also fail to accelerate as quickly out of the turn. This is demonstrated by both a lower exit speed and a less steep increase in speed compared to driverA. To address this, focusing on earlier throttle application and possibly using a lower gear could enhance acceleration and improve overall lap time.

In the provided throttle control analysis, driverA exhibits a delayed and gradual application of throttle compared to driverB. This is evident from the slower ascent in the throttle application curve of driverA, which indicates a later and more cautious power input. This hesitation in applying full throttle results in a loss of potential acceleration and, consequently, time, especially at the corner exit where momentum is crucial. DriverB, on the other hand, demonstrates an earlier and more decisive application of throttle. The steeper curve in their graph suggests a quicker transition to full throttle, which allows for better drive out of the corner. This aggressive approach helps in maintaining higher speeds upon corner exit, contributing to improved lap times. DriverA should emulate this by committing to an earlier throttle application post-apex to minimize time lost during this critical phase of cornering.

Related Blogs

Imola Corner Analysis - Ferrari 296 GT3 (ACC)

DriverB should exit corners with more momentum and apply throttle earlier and more decisively after reaching minimum corner speed to improve lap times and maintain momentum.

Zandvoort Corner Analysis - Ferrari 296 GT3 (ACC)

DriverB should carry more speed through mid-corner and delay throttle for better exit traction. DriverA needs to apply throttle later and smoother for improved exit speeds.

Kyalami Corner Analysis - Ferrari 296 GT3 (ACC)

DriverB's late minimum speed and slower mid-corner phase lead to later throttle application and gradual acceleration, losing time. To improve, they should focus on earlier, aggressive throttle use post-minimum corner speed.